Sunday, March 31, 2019
Swenson
Blue angel poem related
Saturday, March 30, 2019
Blue Angel #2
Blue Angel
Blue Anngel
Friday, March 29, 2019
Blue Angel
Thursday, March 28, 2019
blue angel -swenson
Group Critique
group critique encounter
Group Critics
Group criticism
group critique
Tuesday, March 26, 2019
Mosque Shootings Memorial
Swenson’s curiosity
Blue Angel scene.
Blue Angel- Swensons life
Blue Angel
Blue Angel.
I feel that from the bottom of page 185- 188, Swenson is losing his power over Angela. Swenson should have some authority over Angela, as a teacher, but you don't see that here. Swenson is saying that he'll bring in Angela's novel to his editor, but deep down he doesn't really want to, but he doesn't say no to her. If you read further in the novel then Angela curses Swenson out and he kinda doesn't do anything about that as a teacher. I also feel that Angela is trying to warm herself up to Swenson so that he does send her novel to his email. Further into the novel Angela admits that she slept with Swenson only so that Swenson would read and critique her novel. So perhaps this part shows that Angela is just using Swenson for her own personal gain, but Swenson doesn't pick up on that.
Blue Angel
Blue Angel- Angela's plan
Blue Angel
Blue Angel
Monday, March 25, 2019
Blue Angel, Week 4
Other questions:
- Ruby tells her dad about an incident where a group of fraternity guys pee all over one of the guys' ex-girlfriends. We're in Swenson's head and so we know that, instead of feeling sorry for the victim, he feels sorry for himself and his daughter. Why?
- Ruby hasn't been introduced until pretty late in the novel. Why do you think that is? How does her presence affect your reading of the novel?
- How did you react when Swenson decided to go to NYC the day after Ruby came home?
- In what ways does Swenson compare Ruby to Angela? How did you react as a reader in these moments?
- What other questions do you have?
Blue Angel
Sunday, March 24, 2019
Victim
Angela’s parents
Saturday, March 23, 2019
Angela's shocking statement
Swenson's prolonged overthinking
Blue Angel
Friday, March 22, 2019
Blue Angel
Blue Angel
Tuesday, March 19, 2019
Swensons talk w/ angelas parents
Blue Angel
Scene of Angela parents
Blue angel
Blue Angel
BLUE ANGEL- Angela's weird sex story
Blue Angel
BLUE ANGEL-Parent interaction
Blue Angel
132-136
Monday, March 18, 2019
Blue Angel (Movie)
Blue Angel, Week 3
Other questions:
- Swenson thinks after the sex scene, "Chicken soup! The adulterer's wife cooks him chicken soup. You couldn't get away with writing a scene so obvious and corny..." (177). And yet Prose is writing that scene right there. Does she get away with it? Why or why not?
- The sex scene is a kind of fulcrum, a point that pivots everything else. We've been heading toward this moment for over 100 pp and then it happens and changes everything. How do you see Swenson, Sherrie, and Angela now? What has changed?
- After Swenson reads the sex scene in Angela's novel, he feels determined to prove that he's not the music teacher in her book, that he's better. What do you think?
- What does the broken tooth symbolize?
- Now that the sex has happened, what do you predict will happen next? (If you've read ahead, don't give it away for those who haven't.)
- What questions do you have?
Saturday, March 16, 2019
Library Session Answers
Friday, March 15, 2019
A question I have found useful for my authors notes.
After reading my work, what do you think my major point of this writing is, or points?
Let me explain why I feel that this question should be on everyone's authors notes or at least a modified version of this question. When you write your works, you want to keep in mind that you are writing this for your reader to understand your points. If the reader is reading your works, and does not pick up on your points, then your writing is going to be pointless, no pun intended. In writing this question in your authors notes, what you are asking the reader to do is to tell you what they think you are writing on. If they pick up on your points, and what they write match what your end goal is for your work, then you have succeeded in writing your work. However, if what they write does not match what your intentions are with your work, then using what they think you are writing about, you can tweak your writing a bit. And just keep asking that every time you present your writing in group critique, so that eventually you will write so that the reader picks up on your points. If anyone has any questions on this just leave a comment, and I will try to clarify anything I can.
Writing my Non-Fiction piece
Blue Angel
Thursday, March 14, 2019
blue angel clip
Blue Angel
Watching that part again I believe that Lola Lola is being flirtatious with the Prof.
For example when she says"they all come back for me", and sat him down at the table where she dresses. I think the prof was actually attracted to her at the same time so he played along with the flirting.
Scene-Blue Angel
Scene from blue angel
The Blue Angel
The Blue Angel
Scene from Blue Angel
Scene from “The Blue Angel”
The Blue Angel
There's the clown who always floats around the scene, looking like an angel of death, a depressed prediction of what Prof. Rath will one day become. There is the moment on the floor where we have Dietrich disembodied, becoming just her legs, like meat for the consumption of men. There is the fact that his students are spying on him so though he's falling in love, he's viewed as pathetic and contemptible by the rest of the world (prefiguring when he becomes a literal clown at the end of the film).
Blue Angel
Blue Angel Scene
I also think this is where the professor starts to develop feelings for Lola Lola because of how nervous he acts around her.
Blue Angel Scene
The Blue Angel
Collective Deadline Coming Up
Film- Blue Angel
Wednesday, March 13, 2019
Tuesday, March 12, 2019
Film
Angela
Monday, March 11, 2019
Blue Angel and The Blue Angel
The Blue Angel takes place in Weimer Republic Germany between WWI and II. Berlin, where the film is set, was a haven of liberalism and sexual freedom in the 1920s-30s, esp. in the cabaret culture dramatized in the film.
Some questions that I have:
- Lola Lola is one of the classic femme fatales of cinema. In what ways does Angela Argo seem similar to her?
- In the film, the professor gets into a scuffle w/ a ship captain over Lola Lola. What is the purpose of this scene? Why does Lola seem to be attracted to the professor, esp. since she's so much younger? At what point does she fall out of love w/ him? How would you connect their relationship to Swenson and Angela's?
- What do you make of the relationships that Swenson has w/ other women in his life: his wife, his daughter, Magda? In that lunch scene w/ Magda (pp. 76-84) why do neither seem to be hungry? In what ways are those relationships different than the one he is developing w/ Angela?
- What did you think about the fact that Ted reads Angela's "dirty" poems and then immediately goes and has sex w/ his wife?
- What questions do you have about the film or the novel?
Saturday, March 9, 2019
Blue Angel
Re group critique
Thursday, March 7, 2019
Blue Angel
Group Critique
Wednesday, March 6, 2019
Dead Chicken Theme in Blue Angel
Tuesday, March 5, 2019
Blue Angel
Blue Angel
Blue Angel
Monday, March 4, 2019
Blue Angel
From the questions that professor Talbird has posted, this is what I THINK I know...
1. I think that Swenson has a comfortable relationship with Angela, I know that in the very beginning that were kind of joking around with each other. I think his relationships seem laid back.
2. I think this novel is written from a narrator and Swensons point of view. That makes the reader understand Swensons side of conversations and what not a little better then the others in the book.
3. Based on what I've read, I don't really know whats going to happen because I honestly don't even know whats going on at this point in the book. As I read on maybe I will have a better prediction of how the book is going to turn out.
Beginning Fiction: Blue Angel
Other questions:
- What do you think of his relationship w/ Angela Argo so far? His relationship w/ his wife? With his daughter? With his colleagues?
- What is the point-of-view of this novel and how does that affect the way you're reading it?
- Based on what you've read so far, what do you expect to happen?
- What questions do you have so far?
Sunday, March 3, 2019
Poems
Deceiving Looks
Saturday, March 2, 2019
"Today's Special"
Today's special is all-natural rage,
grilled on a smoldering fire.
It's powerful flavor made subtle with age,
Today's special is all-natural rage. etc.
Smoldering means: when something is burning slowing with smoke but no flame.
To be honest I have ideas what it might mean but I cannot say that I'm sure that I fully understand it.
Once again I'll say poems I have been exposed to recently are harder to analyze correctly than I would have ever imagined.
This poem is on pg. 25 in the book "The best American Poetry," if anyone wants to help me pull it apart and better understand what it is trying to say.... It's not that I do not have any idea as to what it might be saying. I'm just rather uncertain....
How Poems Arrive
Poetry Questions
Friday, March 1, 2019
"Best Poetry"
Answering a question that Prof. Talbird brought up in his most recent post, "These are, according to Gioia and Lehman the "best" poems of 2018. Can you generalize about what it takes to write a "best" poem?". I'm not going to answer this question the way it was proposed, however I would like to explain my thoughts on why Gioia and Lehman picked the poems included in their anthology. I have a couple possible reasons as to why these consider the best poems of 2018. I think the major reason that they consider these poems the best of "2018" is that they challenge the reader. If poetry was easy to understand then it would not really be a popular literary genre to write in. Good poetry challenges the reader, as I mentioned in an earlier post, reading poetry is like trying to get in the mind of the writer, but only being able to see their face. Some poems you might not ever get the true point of. If you want a better explanation of why I think this, just think back to class, when we analyzed poems and, as Prof. Talbird stated in class, came to a consensus about what the poems meant. We came to a consensus because we could not figure out what the writer truly meant, which is why I think that Gioia, and Lehman picked these poems to include in their anthology, because these poems us force to think analytically. The second reason I believe that Gioia and Lehman picked these poems is because the writer's of these poems wrote them in such a way that truly brought light to the concept that poetry is a reflection of the writer. The consensus's we came to in class where about what the writer has intended on us reading. Sure some poems can be analyzed and the meaning pulled right out, but where is the fun in that? These poems demonstrate that the writer encapsulated the idea of hiding themselves behind words while also making their poems interesting to read and analyze. These are my reasons as to why Gioia and Lehman included poems in their anthology.

